In the United States, (as far as the 
		federal government is concerned) churches and church based ministries 
		are automatically tax exempt. According to federal statutes (and the 
		IRS) they do not have to incorporate, register, or report their 
		activities to the federal government.  Donations to churches and 
		church based ministries are fully tax deductible whether they have 
		chosen to  incorporate or register under  501(c)(3) or not. 
		This is not the case for the vast majority of non profit organizations. 
		This may or may not be the case in individual states. The state of 
		Arizona in which this ministry is based does have a registration statute 
		for churches and church based ministries. This ministry is therefore 
		registered with the office of the Secretary of the State of Arizona.
		The hyperlinks will 
		take you to the IRS websites publications as listed. The addresses for 
		these IRS hyperlinks change. If you find the link does not go to the 
		desired page simply type sentence or publication number in you browser 
		and look it up yourself. 
		 
		     
		 IRS 
		Publication 557 Under page 25: Some organizations 
		are not required to file Form 1023. (Form 1023 is the form you 
		register with) These include: Churches, interchurch 
		organizations of local units of a church, conventions or associations of 
		churches, or integrated auxiliaries of a church, such as a men’s or 
		women’s organization, religious school, mission society, or youth group. 
		These organizations are exempt automatically if they meet the 
		requirements of section 501(c)(3) 
		(page 31) under the heading Religious 
		Organizations...Churches states: Churches. Although a church, its 
		integrated auxiliaries, or a convention or association of churches is 
		not required to file Form 1023 to be exempt from federal income tax or 
		to receive tax deductible contributions, the organization may find it 
		advantages to obtain recognition of exemption….. 
		Convention or association of churches: An organization although it is a 
		convention or association of churches will not fail to qualify as a 
		church meerly because the membership of the organization includes 
		individuals as well as churches or because the individuals have voting 
		rights in the organizations. 
		Special rule. Men’s and women’s organizations, seminaries, mission 
		societies, and youth groups that satisfy (1) and (2) shown earlier are 
		integrated auxiliaries of a church even if they are not internally 
		supported. 
		  
		     Notice the 
		such as in 
		that qualification. Such as means these are examples not limitations. 
		Teaching ministries have always been part of churches and groups of 
		churches functions. In fact, Biblically speaking they are one of the 
		main functions.   
		 
		      Eligible Donees Generally Not Listed 
		in
		Publication 78:  Some entities eligible to receive tax deductible 
		charitable contributions may not be listed in Publication 78: Churches 
		and certain affiliated organizations: Publication 78 is based on 
		information received in applications seeking recognition of exemption 
		under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). 1. Churches, their 
		integrated auxiliaries, conventions or associations of churches, and 2. 
		public charities whose annual gross receipts are normally not more than 
		$5,000 may be treated as tax-exempt without filing an application. 
		  
		     Publication 78 is the IRS’s list of 
		registered entities. The reason you may not see churches in there is 
		because they are exempt from registering. They can receive tax 
		deductible donations without registering.  
		 
		     
		IRS Publication 526  Under: Organizations That Qualify To Receive 
		Deductible Contributions; it states: You can deduct 
		your contributions only if you make them to a qualified organization. 
		Most organizations, other than churches and governments, must apply to 
		the IRS to become a qualified organization.  IRS 
		Form 1023 is the application for tax exempt recognition by the IRS 
		under 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.   
		 
    
		Public Charity Exemption Application: To be exempt under section 
		501(c)(3), an organization must file an application for recognition of 
		exemption with the IRS. The law provides limited exceptions to the 
		filing requirement. Exceptions to Application Requirement: 1. Churches, 
		their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of 
		churches; and 2. An organization that is not a private foundation and 
		the gross receipts of which in each taxable year are normally not more 
		than $5,000. 
		 
		      In the early part of the 20th century 
		when congress passed the laws for our current income tax. Shortly 
		afterwards they decided that personnel income taxes may affect the 
		ability of people to donate money to all of the institutions that the 
		nation is dependent upon for its prosperity, and even its long term 
		survival. They crafted laws and regulations that made these institutions 
		tax exempt and donations to them tax deductible.  Passing laws so 
		that charitable and educational organizations (among others) could 
		register with the federal government and apply for exemption and tax 
		deductible status was easy enough. I am assuming though that Churches 
		presented that congress with a unique problem because of the 1st 
		amendment. The problem can be explained by a brief history of the 
		founding era of the nation. 
     The various state constitutions (and writings of the 
		founders of the nation,) were explicit in their understanding of the 
		needs of their states for Christian based virtue. Some states even went 
		as far requiring all towns to build a church and hire a preacher of 
		their choice in their constitutions. 
		Please follow this link to see these constitutions. Almost all of 
		the Constitutions of the founding era contained some similar language 
		and various requirements along those lines. None of them established a 
		particular Christian denomination as their official state church. Four 
		of them directly established general Christianity as the official state 
		religion, (not in a European way though.) All of them in their 
		constitutions explicitly acknowledged general Christianity as the 
		religion of the people and by extension, the religion of the states. 
		When the States decided to unify as one nation under a mutually agreed 
		upon constitution as the basis for governing it. They determined the 
		wording of the document was not strong enough to prevent a central 
		government from naturally acquiring more and more power, and then 
		abusing the God given rights of the people and their states. Thus a bill 
		of the rights of the people and their States, that contained explicate 
		restrictions for the new federal government was agreed upon. The 1st one 
		of these rights and restrictions amendments says this: Congress shall 
		make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the 
		free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the 
		press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition 
		the government for a redress of grievances. 
		The European model of state suppression of God given rights always 
		included an official state religion. This religion was an instrument of 
		the state and not visa versa. Its aim was to suppress the Christianity 
		of the Bible which quite naturally produces in its followers a tendency 
		favoring republican forms of representative government. (Hardly in the 
		interests of kings and dictators.) The founders of the nation had just 
		finished a war with this, and had a healthy fear of a strong central 
		government eventually adopting the same methods. Therefore they placed a 
		specific restriction upon it to neither establish an official federal 
		religion, nor prohibit the people or the states from exercising their 
		religion, (which was explicitly general Christianity.) The other items 
		in the first amendment: Speech, the press, peaceably assembling, and 
		involvement in government are normal functions of Biblical religion as 
		well as secular pursuits.  
     This is why I assume that the congress that wrote these 
		laws and the subsequent ones that added to them explicitly exempted 
		churches and church based ministries from these laws. If Congress gave 
		the IRS the power to grant some churches and their ministries official 
		recognition or federal approval,  then by default it would have the 
		power to not recognize or withhold federal approval from others. Perhaps 
		in a perfect world this would work, but it is not a perfect world and 
		congress apparently understood this. To totally exclude churches and 
		church based ministries from these tax exemptions and donor tax 
		deductions and just give them to organizations they were 
		constitutionally able to regulate wouldn't work.  The churches and 
		church based ministries do the vast majority of the labor, and 
		accomplish the vast majority of the things these laws seek to promote. 
		The nation is dependent on their work, our form of government is not 
		suited for an immoral and ignorant citizenry. So it looks as if the only 
		way to constitutionally be able to do this was to just exempt churches 
		and their ministries from the regulatory requirements all together. 
		Thereby automatically making peoples donations to them tax deducible and 
		the churches and church based ministries tax and regulatory exempt. To 
		do otherwise, either by including them in the regulatory process or 
		excluding them from the exemption, tax deductibility altogether, would 
		be a violation of the most basic rights of the people and the states. 
		Some of the IRS publications allude to the Constitution in its 
		interpretations of the statutory laws passed by congress as to the 
		reason churches and church based ministries cannot be regulated, and 
		still enjoy tax exemption and the ability of donors to deduct their 
		gifts from their income taxes.   
		  
     Since it is abundantly clear that there is no law that 
		requires a church or church based ministry to seek federal recognition 
		of its standing to be tax exempt and to receive tax deductible 
		donations.  Furthermore, that the IRS interprets the law that way 
		itself. Daniel Martinovich Ministries of which Wordservice.org is a part 
		of has chosen to not incorporate nor to seek that recognition. This does 
		not mean that we haven't pledged itself to the highest standards 
		possible for the ministry; to "go the extra mile." We will provide 
		yearly public reports (on the internet) of all financial activities 
		including compensation, and the recipients of that compensation.  
		When the size and scope of the ministries warrant, audited reports by 
		independent auditors will be provided. As the ministry grows church 
		oversight will grow with it. Of course receipts will be  provided 
		for tax deductible purposes. We will fully comply with the federal and 
		state laws concerning individuals income as they apply to churches.  
     It is understood that perhaps some people may fear to, 
		or may not support this ministry because of its refusal to seek IRS 
		approval for its status. (Even though the IRS acknowledges that there is 
		no need to seek their approval for it.)  I guess that is the price 
		that has to be paid to keep just a little bit more of that freedom 
		accorded to us by our creator.  We all have to do what God tells us 
		to do in faith.  Just because it has recently become a  
		cultural norm for churches and their ministries to seek something from 
		the government that the government does not require them to have. That 
		does not mean there is anything wrong or radical in breaking with a 
		cultural norm. In fact in this case it could even be looked on as 
		virtuous and the right thing to do. This is especially true in light of 
		the fact that this is not an issue with the Federal government or IRS. 
		They are not out to  coerce churches and church based ministries to 
		seek their official recognition for tax exempt and tax deductible status 
		that they already have.  The pressure to do this is coming from 
		some where else, as such, the reader can decide where it is coming from 
		themselves.  
		
		 
		 
		 |